ASUS XG27UQR Review | Is It A Good 4K 144hz Monitor

Our Conclusion

The ASUS XG27UQR is presently available for a hefty sum. We can’t dispute that it’s still one of the most affordable 4K 144hz IPS monitors on the market. The 27-inch, on the other side, can’t possibly be a suitable match for 4K resolution, since the result is small text and images. Due to all that, I recommend you going for a larger screen size with a 4k resolution such as the LG 32UL750-W.

Pros

4K

 144hz, 1ms

 Fast IPS

 Wide stand adjustments

Cons

✘ Salty prices

 Dated aesthetics

The benefit of high-resolution screens with high refresh rate ratios is that they may be used in both professional and gaming situations. 

Of course, a 4k display isn’t as good as a 1080p monitor for competitive gaming, but it’s still a good option for crisper graphics. 

Simultaneously, you can simply use the appropriate refresh rate to benefit from the high degree of smoothness it can provide.

Anyway, for today’s article, we have a monitor that fits this hybrid description, and it’s a new addition to the ROG Strix series from Asus, so we have great expectations for it. 

Without further ado, let’s have a look at the ASUS XG27UQR Review and see whether it’s the right display for you.

Design

We can already see a controversial aspect of this display that grabs our attention at first sight, although I’m not sure why they opted to leave it that way. 

It boasts full-sized borderless bezels, which differs significantly from the current trend of 3-sided borderless bezels. It’s a little strange to see something like this for the ROG STRIX series, which is known for its gaming-like displays. 

Of course, some people prefer this style over the borderless one, but the bulk of people prefer the contemporary approach. 

Apart from that, the front bezels of this monitor, as well as other parts of the stand, are finished in the overdone matte black style.

The stand is the feature that makes the monitors in this line seem so similar to one another. The stand is a ROG STRIX classic, with a V-shaped design and a wide variety of adjustments, including tilt, swivel, and height, which may compensate for the display’s expensive price. 

When we look at the back of the display, we can see that they followed the same pattern as the Asus XG27AQM with a line dividing the monitor’s back into two halves, with the right half having a lot of details throughout and a large ROG STRIX logo; and the left half having solid aesthetics and the display buttons. 

Because it is VESA compliant, this monitor may be mounted on the wall. Unfortunately, it lacks external speakers, which might be a major drawback depending on how you want to use this monitor.

Connectors

To try and make up for the really salty prices, they decided to add some useful ports to it, including 2x HDMI 2.0, 1x Headphone-out, and 2x USB-C 3.0.

Features

Panel type

Despite being in this series and at these costs, this monitor lacks the fast IPS function, which might be a deciding factor in classifying it as a non-gaming panel. 

This function is included on several ROG Strix monitors, including the Asus XG27AQM and the ASUS XG349C, which are aesthetically comparable to this one. 

They picked the regular IPS panel for this display since it is less expensive than the fast IPS panel, although it is still inferior in certain ways. 

When it comes to response time figures, the IPS falls short of the fast IPS, making the latter a better alternative for competitive gamers that seek a decent picture quality matched with speed. 

The IPS panel is one of the greatest in terms of accuracy since it presently has the best image quality you can find. The IPS panel is also recognized for its wide viewing angles, which allow you to see the displayed images clearly from different angles.

Brightness

These excellent viewing angles may also permit the manufacturer to reduce the brightness ratio somewhat in order to save money without sacrificing image quality.

Of course, for a costly display like this one, a decent brightness ratio was required; otherwise, the display would not be worth the money. 

That’s why they went with a brightness ratio of 400 nits, which is presently one of the finest available for modern screens. 

This ratio is bright enough no matter how long you use the display or where you place it.

Even if you wish to use it throughout the day and it will be exposed to sunlight during that time, 400 nits will be there to aid in the display of precise visuals.

Refresh rate and Response time

The ASUS XG27UQR‘s refresh rate and response time numbers are unquestionably what distinguishes it as a hybrid, high-resolution model.

It has a fantastic number of 144hz and 1ms, providing the user with fast and smooth pictures. 

For some, 240hz is required for a decent competitive-focused display, although 144hz was popular for this category at the time, and it was an exciting period in monitor history.

Since the lower refresh rates of 60 and 75hz are increasingly being ignored, this sort of monitor may now be classified as casual. 

The response time, unlike the refresh rate, is not a very significant characteristic for ordinary users, but it is for gamers. The command to screen speed is measured by the response time number, with the lower the number, the better.

For everyday and casual use, the variations between these ratios are unlikely to be significant, rendering them unimportant for those.

This monitor has a response time of 1ms, which might be better if it had a fast IPS, but it’s still enough for a high-resolution display.

Image Overall Quality

Let’s have a look at the image quality characteristics of this display and see whether they are indeed comparable to the monitor’s pricing. 

The ASUS XG27UQR sports a 27-inch display with a 4K resolution, resulting in crisp pictures with a high PPI ratio. 

The 27-inch size is certainly a decent size for gamers, but not so much for 4k resolution. This resolution may result in tiny words or images due to the high number of pressed pixels on the 27-inch screen. 

That’s why a screen with a resolution of 4K is best viewed on a 32-inch or larger screen.

Keeping the top-level patterns aside, this display does not disappoint when it comes to color fidelity. It has a 10-bit pattern that can produce up to 1.06B colors, extending the color range of the monitor significantly.

It also offers DCI-P3 90 percent color accuracy, which has a similar gamut to sRGB 100 percent but somewhat more vivid colors. 

To top it off, they chose to employ HDR 400 technology for this display, increasing the contrast and the depth of the darks even further. 

Because this HDR 400 is rather basic, don’t anticipate the best HDR experience with this monitor. 

In general, because of the 4K resolution, this monitor can deliver a professional level of color accuracy and visual sharpness. However, owing to the high resolution, it still has certain issues, as mentioned.

Final thoughts

When to buy it

If you want a 4k monitor with a 144hz refresh rate, good connectors, and nice image quality, the ASUS XG27UQR is for sure one of your best choices. 

Even though it has salty prices, it is still one of the cheapest options with such features. 

Still, if you feel that it is a little over affording a high-end display like this one, you can go for something like the LG 32GP850-B which has similar features but the 2K resolution. 

Don't Miss Out On The Deals!

Sign up to receive the best Amazon monitor and hardware deals of the week, every Friday!

* indicates required

You may like

LG 24MP400-B Review | Affordable With Good Colors

LG 24MP400-B Review | Affordable With Good Colors Our Conclusion Currently, the LG 24MP400-B is one of the cheapest IPS monitors in the low-end category ...

Best Budget 1440p 144hz Monitor | The Best Of 2023

Best Budget 1440p 144hz Monitor | Only The Best Of 2023 Although 4K is considered the ultimate resolution for an immersive gaming experience, 1440p is ...
Review lg 24mk430h reatbyte

Great price-performance monitor of 2020 | LG MK430H Review.

Great price-performance monitor of 2020 | LG MK430H Review. If you're on the hunt for a budget-friendly monitor that doesn't compromise on color quality, the ...

MSI G321CU Review | The Best Of The Year

MSI G321CU Review | The Best Of The Year Our Conclusion Right now, the MSI G321CU is the cheapest 4K screen with 144hz and other ...

Msi B550m Pro-Vdh Wifi Review | The Cheapest b550?

Msi B550m Pro-Vdh Wifi Review | The Cheapest b550? Our Conclusion If you're looking for a motherboard that can handle day-to-day casual tasks with ease, ...

LG 34WP60C-B Review | Not The Best Version

LG 34WP60C-B Review | Not The Best Version Our Conclusion Although the LG 34WP60C-B's prices may drop over time and during a sale, they are ...

Asus VG289Q1A Review | One Of The Cheapest 4K

Asus VG289Q1A Review | One Of The Cheapest 4K Our Conclusion The Asus VG289Q1A is still one of the finest in terms of costs and ...

LG 27UN850-W Review | Good But With Caveats

LG 27UN850-W Review | Good But With Caveats Our Conclusion The LG 27UN850-W can be among the finest options for you at this price range ...

LG 32GP750-B Review | Better Avoid It For Now

LG 32GP750-B Review | Better Avoid It For Now Our Conclusion The LG 32GP750-B has seen a significant drop in price, going from $400 last ...

Acer ED273UR Review | One of the best VA monitors.

Acer ED273UR Review | One of the best VA monitors. Our Conclusion The Acer ED273UR is unquestionably one of the top VA monitors in terms ...

Asus VG32VQ1B Review | One Of The Best Budget VAs

Asus VG32VQ1B Review | One Of The Best Budget VAs Our Conclusion The ASUS VG32VQ1B has a significant amount of black smearing, but in contrast, ...

LG 34WL75C-B Review | Not Worth It Right Now

LG 34WL75C-B Review | Not Worth It Right Now Our Conclusion The LG 34WL75C-B is a perfect illustration of what a monitor that has the tagline "not ...

LG 32UK50T-W Review | Don’t Buy It Right Now

LG 32UK50T-W Review | Don't Buy It Right Now Our Conclusion As long as we have the LG 32UN550-W on the market, the LG 32UK50T-W ...

Acer ED270R Review | Cheap But Flawed

Acer ED270R Review | Cheap But Flawed Our Conclusion The Acer ED270R's bulky style, combined with a huge deal of low responsiveness and low PPI, ...

MSI Optix G32CQ4 Review | One Of The Most Affordable

MSI Optix G32CQ4 Review | One Of The Most Affordable Our Conclusion The MSI Optix G32CQ4 is one of the most affordable gaming displays by ...

LG 32UN650-W Review | Is It Still Worth It Today?

LG 32UN650-W Review | Is It Still Worth it Today? Our Conclusion The LG 32UN650-W would have been among the finest in the $400–500 high-resolution ...

HP P34hc G4 Review | Still Bad But Slightly Better

HP P34hc G4 Review | Still Bad But Slightly Better Our Conclusion When we compare both, we can say that the main difference between the ...

Hp M34D Review | A Mediocre Ultrawide Screen.

Hp M34D Review | A Mediocre Ultrawide Screen. Our Conclusion Unfortunately, the KVM feature and a large number of connectors are the only things that ...

LG 27UL500-W Review | Is This The Cheapest 4K Screen?

LG 27UL500-W Review | Is This The Cheapest 4K Screen? Our Conclusion While on sale, the LG 27UL500-W turns into one of the cheapest professional ...

Dell SE2722H Review | Downsides Outweighing Benefits

Dell SE2722H Review | Downsides Outweighing Benefits Our Conclusion The Dell SE2722H holds the position in Dell's low-end 27-inch displays category, but due to its ...

2 thoughts on “ASUS XG27UQR Review | Is It A Good 4K 144hz Monitor”

  1. I also do graphic design and sometimes play games. But the game is not my first priority. I doubt between this model and VG28UAL1A. I am aware of the differences between these two displays, but technically I don’t know which one offers better colors and has a higher build quality.
    If the VG28UAL1A monitor offers exactly the same quality and color tone along with those features (screen rotation, HDMI 2.1, etc.), I will buy it, and if not, I can ignore the more features it has. Because I need it for long term use. And sometimes I work with the computer more than 12 hours a day.
    I heard from many people that ROG series always have higher quality and longer life than TUF series in the same price category.
    Really, the response time of 1 millisecond is not that important for me and it is more marketable.

    1. The VG289Q1A has better colors out of the box, and it looks better as well. Still, I would go with the ASUS XG27UQR due to its high refresh rate. And assuming you have a colorimeter to calibrate the colors, you can make both perform almost the same in terms of color accuracy.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *